|
Post by chiltooth on Jan 30, 2011 12:23:56 GMT -5
Rules of thumb concerning copyright: Some of these rules assume free-form is being utilized. Silvers have some degree of built-in protection from being able to make clones of certain characters. 1) Same look + same name = not allowed, don't do it regardless of what powers the character uses 2) Same look + different name + same powers = allowed but prone to being reported by those who don't know the rules all that well, use with caution 3) Different look + same name + same powers = allowed provided the name isn't filtered in the creator, the more obscure the character the higher the chances the name isn't blocked 4) Slightly different look + different name + same powers = Homage character, allowed and encouraged to a degree Originality is your best option by far. I am a returning player. I actaully started in closed beta. When the game launched my main was a gold account homage to Iceman. His looks were different, his name was different but the powers were the same. When I did play I did see more DBZ clones than any other clone I have ever seen. I would say to those that do make clones. I could've probably paid for at least one or two month's worth of subs if I had a dollar for all of the DBZ clones that I reported back then.
|
|
|
Post by rpgamerd00d on Feb 8, 2011 14:10:07 GMT -5
Just a few words on this topic.
Fair Use
Fair use is a judicial doctrine that refers to a use of copyrighted material that does not infringe or violate the exclusive rights of the copyright holder. Fair use is an important and well established limitation on the exclusive right of copyright owners. Examples of fair use include the making of braille copies or audio recordings of books for use by blind people, and the making of video recordings of broadcast television programs or films by individuals for certain private, noncommercial use.
Examples of fair use typically involve, according to the Copyright Act of 1976, the reproduction of authored works for the purpose of "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching …, scholarship, or research" (17 U.S.C.A. § 107). The same act also establishes a four-part test to determine fair use according to the following factors: (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work (17 U.S.C.A. § 107).
It is usually considered fair use of an authored work to take small quotations or excerpts and to include them in another work, as when quotations are taken from a book and inserted into a book review. However, courts have found that such quotation is not fair use when material is taken from unpublished sources, as happened in the 1985 case Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 105 S. Ct. 2218, 85 L. Ed. 2d 588.
The Harper case involved publication by The Nation magazine of quotations from Gerald R. Ford's unpublished memoir, A Time to Heal. Harper & Row, publisher of the memoir, sued The Nation, claiming that the magazine's actions had caused it to lose a lucrative contract with Time Magazine to publish excerpts from the memoir. The Court ruled in favor of Harper, citing the economic value of first publication to the copyright holder as an important factor in its decision. It found that The Nation had infringed Ford's copyright by becoming the first publisher of his original expression, thereby inflicting economic losses on Ford. It rejected The Nation's argument that it was simply reporting news. Lower courts have subsequently applied the Court's reasoning to other cases involving quotations from unpublished works. In Salinger v. Random House, 811 F.2d 90 (2d Cir. 1987), a federal appeals court blocked publication of a book that used extensive quotations from unpublished letters of the author J. D. Salinger. The court ruled that the author retained copyright ownership of the "expressive content" of the letters, even when the letters themselves were deposited in university library collections.
Parody often constitutes fair use of copyrighted material. In cases involving parodies of copyrighted works, courts typically assess the purpose and intent involved in taking material from the original expression, and whether or not the author of the parody has borrowed a reasonable amount of material in producing the parody. For example, in the 1994 case of Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 501 U.S. 569, 114 S. Ct. 1164, 127 L. Ed. 2d 500—which involved a parody by the rap group 2 Live Crew of the Roy Orbison song "Pretty Woman"—the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a parody could be fair use under copyright law even if it is created for commercial purposes.
==================
It seems to me that the 1st test of fair use would indicate that you can create a "known" character in Champions Online, with the same name, look and powers, because you are not profiting from its creation.
|
|
|
Post by KenpoJuJitsu3 on Feb 8, 2011 14:42:41 GMT -5
Fair use unfortunately has zero bearing when it violates the TOS that everyone agrees to before playing.
Copyrighted characters are a violation of the TOS and therefore not allowed.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 8, 2011 16:44:08 GMT -5
Fair use unfortunately has zero bearing when it violates the TOS that everyone agrees to before playing. Copyrighted characters are a violation of the TOS and therefore not allowed. That is correct. Its like how there is no law against cheating in a video game, but it DOES break Cryptic's rules, so they will still punish you if you do so.
|
|